梦海业绩｜香港玛瑞瓦禁令（Mareva Injunction）最终胜诉

近日，广东梦海律师律师事务所收到了一封来自香港高等法院的胜诉判决，历时一年半，经历了三次聆讯，最终判决我方胜诉，冻结对方财产的玛瑞瓦禁令持续生效。

A plaintiff seeking a Mareva Injunction must satisfy the Court that (a) it has a good arguable case, (b) there is a real risk of dissipation of assets, or removal of assets from the jurisdiction, which would render the plaintiff’s judgment of no effect, and (c) the balance of convenience is in favour of grant.

原告申请玛瑞瓦禁令（Mareva Injunction）须向法庭证明以下三项要件：

（a）具有充分可论证的案情（good arguable case）；

（b）存在资产流失的真实风险，包括资产转移至司法管辖区外的可能，该风险将导致原告胜诉判决无法执行；

（c）便利平衡倾向于批准该禁令。

In the premises, and as against Liu,

a. I accede to the Continuation Summons and make an order in terms of paragraph 1 thereof; 

b. I give judgment to Ps granting the relief as against Liu in terms of paragraph 1 of the Amended OS; and 

c. Costs should follow the event. I order on nisi basis that Liu pays Ps costs of these proceedings, including the costs of the Continuation Summons, to be taxed if not agreed.  This order nisi will become absolute unless any party applies to vary within 14 days.

基于上述理由，针对被告Liu的裁决如下：

a. 本院准予延续冻结令申请，并按照该申请第1段的内容作出相应命令；

b. 本院判决支持原告的请求，根据修订版原诉传票第1段的内容对Liu作出救济命令；

c. 诉讼费用应随结果而定。本院作出暂准命令，要求Liu承担原告在本案中的所有诉讼费用（包括延续冻结令申请的费用），若双方未能达成协议则按标准评定。本暂准命令将在14日内转为绝对命令，除非任何一方在此期间内提出变更申请。

In the premises, and as against Chui, 

a. I dismiss Chui’s Summons; 

b. I give judgment to Ps and grant an injunction under the Chabra jurisdiction as against her in terms that would incorporate my views expressed in §§108, 110 and 112 above; and 

c. Ps are to provide Chui a proposal on the terms of the injunction within 7 days, and Ps and Chui do attempt to come to agreement within 7 days after, failing which parties are to submit a joint letter 14 days thereafter setting out their proposed versions with succinct explanations for this Court to approve the final wording. For the avoidance of doubt, Chui will be released from Chui’s Undertaking only upon the judgment containing the injunction has been sealed and served on her.

基于上述认定，针对被告Chui的裁决如下：

a. 本庭驳回Chui的传票申请；

b. 本庭判决支持原告请求，并根据Chabra管辖权对Chui作出禁制令，具体条款将体现本判决第108、110及112段所述意见；

c. 原告须在7日内向Chui提交禁制令条款建议书，双方应在随后的7日内尽力达成协议。若未能达成一致，各方须在此后14日内共同向本庭提交说明函，列明各自建议版本并附简要解释，以供本庭最终核准具体措辞。为免存疑，Chui的承诺义务仅在本判决所含禁制令经盖章并送达后方可解除。

Chui has some success in cutting down the ambit of the Chabra injunction as against her. My provisional view is that Ps should be deprived 15% of their costs. I thus order on nisi basis that Chui do pay Ps 85% of their costs of these proceedings, including the costs of Chui’s Summons, to be taxed if not agreed.  This will also become absolute after the lapse of 14 days unless any party applies to vary within that time.

关于被告Chui的诉讼费用裁定如下：

鉴于Chui在限缩针对她的Chabra禁制令适用范围方面取得部分成功，本庭初步认为应扣减原告15%的诉讼费用。据此作出暂准命令：Chui须支付原告85%的诉讼费用（包括Chui传票申请的相关费用），若双方未能达成协议则由法院评定具体金额。本命令将在14日期限届满后自动转为绝对命令，除非任何一方在此期间内提出变更申请。